Each of those threads is attached at one end to the web and at the other end to a tiny metal clamp around a few strands of natural hair at the scalp. The client’s natural hair is attached to the hairpiece by forty to sixty separate threads. The circles of thread are then anchored to each other by separate threads, which radiate from the center so that the underside of the resulting hairpiece resembles a spider’s web. The threads are then attached end-to-end in concentric circles over the client’s head. Each skein consists of a line of hairs attached to a thread about one inch in length. “The intervention involves the use of skeins of natural donor hair. Ivari by Alicia Roach in 2001-a case won by Ivari-presented to be a true “breakdown of what amicrocylinder treatment actually entails”:Ī. The following false statements taken from a lawsuit filed against Mr. Ivari by Alicia Roach”-that is, an official judicial proceeding, the publication of which is protected by New York State’s fair report privilege: The second set of “defamatory” statements, Harder claims, were “taken from a lawsuit filed against Mr. Here’s what Feinberg actually wrote (emphasis mine): “What’s more, Ivari’s New York location was inside Trump Tower-on the private floor reserved for Donald Trump’s own office.” Furthermore, he didn’t even quote the article correctly. For instance, one of the “defamatory” statements Gawker published, according to Harder, is this: “What’s more, Ivari’s New York location is inside Trump Tower-on the private floor reserved for Donald Trump’s own office.” Harder omits, of course, the sources on which this assertion was based: Ivari’s own brochure, an archived version of his web site, and multiple advertisements Ivari placed in New York Magazine, all of which specified his New York address as being on the 25th floor of the Trump Tower in Manhattan. These claims are, on their face, ridiculous. Harder goes on to threaten legal action over the story: “Your actions expose you to substantial monetary damages and punitive damages.” immediately provide us with the name and all contact information for the unnamed “tipster” of the Story, so that we can serve that person with an immediate cease and desist letter to stop the spread of the false Story.
Harder’s demands included the immediate removal of the story from Gawker, a public apology, the preservation of “all physical and electronic documents, materials and data in your possession” related to the story, and, notably, that we reveal our sources. Harder enumerates 19 different purportedly defamatory statements-almost all of which were drawn from several publicly available lawsuits filed against Ivari. Harder, sent Gawker a letter on behalf of Ivari International’s owner and namesake, Edward Ivari, in which Harder claims that Feinberg’s story was “false and defamatory,” invaded Ivari’s privacy, intentionally inflicted emotional distress, and committed “tortious interference” with Ivari’s business relations. Last week, Thiel’s lawyer-for-hire, Charles J. press had investigated the Bush Administration’s claims about Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction with the same energy, the Iraq War might have been avoided.īut if you were under the impression that praise-worthy journalism is somehow inoculated against campaigns like Thiel’s, you’d be mistaken. Thiel has portrayed Gawker as a force for evil, but Feinberg’s article-which drew potential connections between Trump and the work of a $60,000-a-pop hair-extension company called Ivari International-still went over rather well, drawing praise from staffers at the Times, the Wall Street Journal, and The Atlantic and at least three winners of the Pulitzer Prize.Įven David Simon, the award-winning reporter-turned-screenwriter and frequent critic of Gawker, offered his accolades, arguing that if the U.S.
#Peter thiel gawker torrent#
Presumptive GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump has generated an unceasing torrent of press… One day after the Silicon Valley billionaire Peter Thiel revealed his clandestine legal attack on Gawker Media to the New York Times, Gawker reporter Ashley Feinberg published a lengthy investigation that sought to solve the enduring mystery of Donald Trump’s infamous mane, which she described as a “cotton candy hairspray labyrinth.” Is Donald Trump’s Hair a $60,000 Weave? A Gawker Investigation
Pictured: Peter Thiel, Donald Trump, and Charles Harder.
0 kommentar(er)
